The Touch Factor

Photo by August de Richelieu on Pexels.com

Do you look forward to the moment you see a good friend, and anticipate the hug that will follow, imagining the love and joy you’ll feel as your arms reach around her and squeeze? Or, is it the opposite? Anxiety as you anticipate that obligatory hug? Discomfort and unease and hoping it will be over as quickly as possible?

I need to make a distinction here. There is a legitimate phobia of being touched that is beyond just uncomfortability. That fear is called Haphephobia. It’s defined as extreme, irrational distress over being touched by anyone, and it is immobilizing for many people. It’s symptoms can include nausea, vomiting, heart palpitations, sweating, hyperventilating, hives, and panic attacks. That’s not the kind of unease being addressed here. What I’m talking about is slightly less debilitating, but still very real. These are the people who say “I’m just not a hugger.”

Of course we’re not just talking about hugging, but all aspects of physical touch. And there are many different levels of this love/hate relationship. There is the extreme toucher who will grab someone they are meeting for the first time and hold on like its a long lost best friend. You’ve probably seen a scene like this in a movie. A young man is meeting his girlfriend’s parents for the first time and is nervous about how he will be perceived. He offers a “nice to meet you Mr. Smith,” and Mr. Smith says, “oh, get over here and give me a hug!” and proceeds to grip him firmly and hold on for dear life. And then on the other end of the spectrum is the person who hangs back, giving a simple, small wave–at a safe distance of course.

So I wondered. How come some people like it and some people don’t?

This question brings up the usual response when discussing many human characteristics: Genes, or Environment? The evidence regarding touch seems to lean more heavily on the side of environment. Studies have shown that how much you touch as an adult is directly linked to the amount of physical touch you received in childhood. A 2012 study published in Comprehensive Psychology found that people raised by frequent huggers were more likely to be huggers in adulthood. And the opposite is also true. If you were raised with little physical touch, you are likely to exhibit the same traits with your children.

There might be differences for men, versus women. In another study, published in Communication Monographs, researchers found that, in women, affectionate behavior can be explained 45% by hereditary and 55% by environmental influences. For men, affectionate behavior instead seems to be solely influenced by environmental factors. The study examined adult twins, comparing identical twins, who share both the same environment and 100% of the same genes, with fraternal twins, who share the same environment, but only 50% of the same genes (the same as other siblings). If genetics didn’t play any role, we would expect that the scores of people in fraternal twin pairs would be just as similar as the scores of people in identical twin pairs, who are more alike genetically. But that was not the case. The identical twin pairs scored more similarly than the fraternal twin pairs – at least in the case of women – suggesting that there is, in fact, a genetic component to affectionate behavior.

Part of the reason for a discrepancy between men and women may be that women, overall, tend to be more affectionate, perhaps the result of evolutionary forces. Still, in both cases environmental factors appear to play a bigger role.

Of course there are cases where the opposite is true: Some children grow up feeling starved for touch and end up being very demonstrative with family and friends later in life. I think I fall slightly into this category. While I always felt loved as a child, hugs and kisses were not part of our normal day. I have definitely tried to be different with my kids, and in addition to saying “I love you” every day, I have tried to hug and kiss them more than I experienced as a kid.

And yet. . . I have two children, and one will take any opportunity to grab a hug while the other will usually opt out. Hmmm. Similar genes, same environment. So whatever the dominant results are, as with most things in life, the studies don’t always bear out in reality.

Aside from the obvious factor of growing up with a family that was not physically demonstrative, what are some other environmental factors that could negatively affect your feelings toward physical touch?

  • Past trauma
  • Postpartum disorder
  • Stress
  • Lack of trust
  • Media
  • Personal relationships
  • Negative body image

And aside from the “hugging” gene, what are some genetic possibilities that might affect a person’s predisposition to touch? Neurodiverse spectrum seems to top the list. This covers many conditions including, but not limited to autism, aspergers, and ADHD. OCD is another possibility for a dislike of physical touch.

There also appear to be cultural differences. In one study conducted in coffee shops in different countries, findings showed that Americans touched approximately twice during a single conversation, but in France and Puerto Rico, that number was over 100.

So is one tendency better than the other? The answer to that appears to be a resounding YES!

Lack of physical touch can lead to an underdeveloped vagus nerve, a bundle of nerves that runs from the spinal cord to the abdomen. Research shows this can decrease your ability to be intimate or compassionate and can lead to an underdeveloped oxytocin system. Signals to the vagus nerve recognize any form of touch and release oxytocin –sometimes called the love hormone, or cuddle hormone. A lack of this release can hinder your ability to form human bonds, and this effect can be long lasting. A 2014 study of Romanian orphans who were hardly touched in the orphanage, found that those orphans, who were later adopted, did not display the expected rise in oxytocin when sitting on their parents laps, such as you might see in children who had this experience from birth.

Here are some other ways in which lack of physical touch can be harmful:

  • Lack of intimacy or intimacy avoidance
  • Lack of bonding
  • Feelings of unhappiness and depression
  • Anxiety
  • Difficulty sleeping
  • Low relationship satisfaction

On the flip side, the benefits of physical touch are numerous:

  • Feelings of happiness and pleasure
  • Feelings of being loved
  • Reduced stress
  • Reduced heart rate and blood pressure
  • Lack of depression due to oxytocin and serotonin
  • Higher self confidence
  • Feelings of reassurance, empathy, compassion from another person
  • Better immunity: A 2015 study by Carnegie Mellon showed that people who were hugged experienced a 32% boost in immunity
  • Lower levels of inflammation, a cause of many chronic health problems

Clearly physical touch has a positive impact on both our mental, and physical lives. So what should you do if you don’t like to hug, but would like to attempt to get the benefits of increased physical touch? Ease into it with less invasive forms of affection. Samantha Hess, a “professional cuddler,” runs a company that teaches people how to enjoy a platonic touch and claims to have 78 different poses to meet each individual’s comfort level. Try massage, holding and petting animals, getting your hair or nails done. We tend to think of hugging, but the benefits of physical touch apply to all types: A fist bump, back slapping, high fives and a simple hand touch on an arm can all create the same benefits. And these benefits extend to both individuals. Sit close to loved ones, try a hug with those who are closest to you. maybe a pat on the shoulder or back. You could even try a new activity like a team sport or dancing.

Of course we always want to be sensitive to others who may not like to hug. If you aren’t sure how others feel, reach out for a less invasive fist bump, or skip the contact altogether.

And if you’re already prone to physical touch, continue to encourage that tendency by reaching out for loved ones who you know would welcome it. Instead of just at bedtime, grab that hug any time, or try a pat on the back which works for encouragement, recognition, or sympathy. Younger kids also love a “secret handshake.” Let’s face it, you can’t perform a secret handshake without feeling happy and connected.

I know I said I’ve tried to be demonstrative with my kids, but the truth is, I don’t really want to touch or be touched by strangers, and I hate the fake hug with the pat, pat on the back with as little “real” touch as possible. However, even with people I’m meeting for the first time, I do enjoy a good, firm handshake, or a fist bump. To me those reflect friendliness and respect, which are always welcome.

But if you’re someone for whom I feel affection, give me a great big bear hug any day. And yes, you can squeeze.

The Way I Want to Be

Photo by Andrea Piacquadio on Pexels.com

I sometimes struggle with two theories about the best way to live a satisfying life. The first camp suggests that we achieve peace by practicing gratitude. The argument for being grateful is pretty straightforward and compelling. When we stop and think, most of us have everything we really need. A home, a job, our health, food on the table, perhaps a family and a supportive social network; all the basic necessities for happiness. We know that there are so many less fortunate people than us in the world. Homelessness, hunger, disease, war, persecution, and lack of human rights are all alive and present in our world. And yet we’ve become so used to complaining. Over the weekend a car was rudely beeping when another car tried to pull in front of him within merging traffic. This morning I saw someone get impatient when having to wait in line. And all of us have gotten frustrated when the extra cream, mocha latte we ordered wasn’t prepared correctly. Reading this, we probably all see how silly it is to complain about such minor things.

There is abundant research regarding the link between practicing gratitude and happiness. In one study, Group One wrote a gratitude letter to another person every week for three weeks. Group Two wrote down their thoughts about negative experiences, and Group Three did nothing. All three groups received counseling. After twelve weeks Group one still reported significantly better mental health (Wong and Brown, 2017). In another study, participants were asked to write down their gratitude items for 21 days. A the end of the 21 days they reported feeling more optimistic, less anxious, and better rested both immediately after, and for three to six months after the study. And its not just mental health that benefits. In a 2015 study (Huffman, Beale, Beach, Celano, Belcher, Moore, Suarez, Gandhi, Motiwala, Gaggin, Januzzi) patients who expressed optimism/gratitude had healthier hearts two weeks after a coronary event.

And the benefits of practicing gratitude go on:

  • Acknowledgement that there is goodness in the world and that you are the beneficiary of that goodness
  • Becoming less materialistic
  • Less likely to experience burnout
  • Better physical health
  • Better sleep
  • Less physical inflammation
  • More Patience and greater resiliency
  • Redirect of focus from toxic, negative emotions
  • Trains our brain to look for the positive

All of this makes sense to me. And its easy to get started. You don’t need money, equipment, or training. Just a little bit of time. There are many free apps you can download for suggestions, but even that isn’t necessary. Here are some ideas.

Ways to Practice Gratitude:

  • Meditation: Download a free app or youtube video
  • Keep a Journal
  • Write a Letter
  • Recognize a moment of happiness or kindness and take a moment to appreciate it
  • Say thank you to others and be specific about what you’re being thankful for

The second theory about how to achieve happiness and satisfaction in your life seems almost contradictory to the gratitude theory. This one states that we should never be satisfied with less than what we have always wanted or perhaps what we deserve. Accepting “less” often translates to a word with very negative connotations: Settling. Believers of the “never settle” theory claim that settling will lead to negative results, including:

  • Lower happiness/life satisfaction
  • Having regrets
  • Wishing things were different
  • Feeling that you aren’t living up to your potential
  • Looking back on your dreams and feeling disappointed

What is wrong, the non-settlers would argue, with continuing to seek a better job, car, house, partner? Aren’t we just settling if what we have is not the best that we want or deserve? Clearly settling is always bad. Or is it? According to Oxford, the definitions of “settle” are as follows: 1. resolve or reach an agreement; 2. pay a debt or account; 3. adopt a more steady or secure way of life. Interestingly, none of the connotations of what we think of these days which in essence is “being satisfied with less than you deserve.” In fact, the definition of adopting a more steady or secure way of life sounds pretty positive. Should we always chase our dreams, or should we be grateful for what we have? When, if ever, is it okay to “Settle?” and When is it bad to settle?

We make decisions like this on a daily basis, even for minor issues. We make the decision based on comparing two possible outcomes. For example, should I pack and bring my lunch to work, or should I go to MacDonalds? The first option might be less expensive and healthier, but option 2 might offer more enjoyment while eating. The decision that is reached will likely be different for different people. So when might settling be a problem that will lead to lower life satisfaction?

You might be “settling” for less happiness if:

  • You find you are always complaining
  • You wake up in the morning and dread going in to work
  • You have people in your life but are still lonely
  • You are putting up with a dangerous situation (abuse, alcoholism, etc)
  • You frequently feel unhappy or anxious about situations in your life
  • You are not acting because you are afraid of failure

I recently read an article about settling in which the author claimed that there are always better options out there. This did not ring true to me. I feel there has to be some element of reality. Does it make sense to decide in your later years that you want to be an actress and you have not had any training, and do not have any exposure to people who might make this dream a reality? Leaving a stable job and moving to LA in this instance might not be the best idea. And even if it’s true that there is always a better option, then won’t we always be chasing something better? When is it safe to be satisfied and be grateful for what you already have?

So which of these two practices is going to lead to more happiness? I propose that these two trains of thought, both with great supporting arguments, can live simultaneously. Certainly practicing gratitude offers benefits that we can all enjoy. The thing about gratitude is, you get to decide what you’re grateful for. So you can be grateful for the fact that you have a job and are not struggling financially, while still taking some steps toward accomplishing the dream job. Or maybe the dream job is out of reach, for one reason or another. It’s okay to adjust your dreams, based on your current situation. If we never altered our dreams, we would all still be hoping to be Rock Stars or Super Heroes! I, for example, have a day job working in a bank. I’ve been in banking for over 30 years and the industry has provided me and my family with a stable income, some level of advancement, and many benefits that give me peace of mind. It’s not my dream job, but I get to experience my dream of writing by talking to you through this blog. In this way I’m able to incorporate both my practice of gratitude, and the pursuit of my dreams.

Ultimately, each of us has to decide for ourselves. Like many of life’s choices, this one does not have the same answer for everyone. And, I think, like many other lifestyle choices, it comes down to balance. For you, health may be most important, while for someone else it might be wealth, or for someone else it might be strong social relationships. Whatever is most important to you right now, you can probably find something in your current situation to be grateful for. And also something you can still strive for. I think that utilizing both strategies is sure to lead to greater happiness.

This is How I Want to Be.

What I’m Reading Now-Hardwiring Happiness

Photo by Kat Smith on Pexels.com

Book: Hardwiring Happiness

Fiction/Nonfiction: Nonfiction

Author: Rick Hanson, Ph.D

Have I Read this Author Before: No

One Sentence Summary: It is possible, by focusing on even minor things that make you happy, to change, or train (hardwire) your brain to be more aware of the good things in your life, thus making you “happier”

Best Thing About the Book: Some simple tips to force yourself to focus on the positive which you can actually do at any moment in your day simply by stopping and looking around

Worst Thing About the Book: Once the basic concept was clear, it started to feel a little repetitive

Did It Make Me Want to Keep Reading: For a while, and then once I felt I had grasped the concept, I did skim a little toward the end

What I Learned: Great tips for focusing, and taking a moment to enjoy (enrich, so your brain learns to absorb) even minor happy moments (a pretty sunset, a goodbye kiss with your sweetheart, a smile from a stranger).

The Bottom Line: As a self-help book addict, this was one of my recent favorites in terms of easy-to-follow suggestions for being happier; Check out Rick’s Ted Talk!

Would I read this Author Again: Yes

Next Book to Read By This Author: Resilient